Linux version 6.6.5 (root@bitskii) (gcc (GCC) 13.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sat Dec 9 09:24:54 UTC 2023
prepare for kernel.org mainline, then you dont have multiarch
anymore, either you need 32bit only or not :)
so now kernel.org have final a kernel for alpha'arch with pure
64bit only
userland have disabled 32bit long time ago in gentoo
Hey Benny!
prepare for kernel.org mainline, then you dont have multiarch
anymore, either you need 32bit only or not :)
'or not' sounds like what I've been doing for the last 15-20 years or
so.
so now kernel.org have final a kernel for alpha'arch with pure
64bit only
x86_64 pure 64bit for ages. This is nothing new.
userland have disabled 32bit long time ago in gentoo
I think I beat them all to the punch. I could look it up, but going
by my less than perfect memory I am guesstimating 2005 at the latest. Also c-only. Absolutely zero c++ source was harmed in the making. Roughly 128M for the entire development 'distribution' (gcc-4 and friends).
Those were the days my friend.
you miss my point
i have a 80286 in my gvp amiga harddisk controller, so i could
use msdos
or maybe linux for 16 bit arch :)
64bit will not see any change on it
gentoo gcc needs 4Gb ram to compile now, with 1Gb it does not work
8bit and 16bit hardware boards still lives on self made boards on facebook, i wonder why ?
you miss my point, i have a 80286 in my gvp amiga harddisk controller, so i co
d use msdos, or maybe linux for 16 bit arch :)
I was not aware that amiga HD controllers had 80286 chips on them.
That is interesting. Would you be able to install an intel OS and
still be able to also use your amiga processor to run an amiga os
(like dual boot)?
you miss my pointBusiness as usual. ;-)
i have a 80286 in my gvp amiga harddisk controller, so i couldI suppose except it escapes me why anyone would willingly do that.
use msdos
or maybe linux for 16 bit arch :)What are you smoking over there?
That was never possible as far as I
am aware.
minix would be the only real choice if one wishes to waste
electicity for little to no reward. It's all abandonware for good reason.
64bit will not see any change on itSo in other words it matters little to nothing whether or not a 64 bit
processor can emulate a lesser platform (32 bit) given nobody is
noticing anyhow.
Also where are you finding any REAL development on
32 bit platforms anymore?
Speaking for myself, I was more than happy
to create my very first 64 bit system using dual p3's which are 32 bit given at the time there was no distribution that was pure 64 bit at
the time. It worked great once installed and booted on an actual
x86_64 platform.
gentoo gcc needs 4Gb ram to compile now, with 1Gb it does not work
That doesn't surprise me. Although I am not a big fan of bloat, in
this case both economics and available applications make's current development extremely attractive.
Also when targetting a minimal
system, it doesn't require 4Gb of ram to run ...
unless we're talking
firefox and other greedy applications that really don't have much meaningful to offer in return.
gcc is worth the extra bytes given all
it has to offer in return. These days that is a very rare trait and I for one am thankful for it.
8bit and 16bit hardware boards still lives on self made boards on
facebook, i wonder why ?
I say they can keep them. They have diddley-squat.
Amiga HD controlers per see dont. They need extra hardware.
BridgeBoards, emulation support cards
BridgeBoards allow using IBM compatible hardware components in an
Amiga. Emulation support cards give the
Amiga the extra hardware for the complete software emulation of other platforms.
http://amiga.resource.cx/dir/bridge
pc market was at that time crap just like winCE :)
What are you smoking over there?
its only allowed in holland ?
help of a raspberry pi wifi board, that simply emulate a
cassette drive
kernel 6.7.3 is now stable, so i upgraded :=)
Linux version 6.7.3 (root@bitskii) (gcc (GCC) 13.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.42) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Feb 1 14:10:32 UTC 2024
minix was imho 8 bit not 16 ?
currently not fixed on there side to come up with a solution on
low mem gcc compile at all
I say they can keep them. They have diddley-squat.
its a learning device
you miss my point, i have a 80286 in my gvp amiga harddisk controller,I don't think that linux will run on a 286, but minux might.
so i co d use msdos, or maybe linux for 16 bit arch :)
I was not aware that amiga HD controllers had 80286 chips on them.
That is interesting. Would you be able to install an intel OS and still be
able to also use your amiga processor to run an amiga os (like dual boot)?
I don't think that linux will run on a 286, but minux might.
+1
386SX33. It could run Linux but was hell slow :D
That is interesting. Would you be able to install an intel OS and still b
able to also use your amiga processor to run an amiga os (like dual boot)
yes the 286 runs msdos perfektly fine, async with amiga at same time, if you h
e a z80 mbc, it would be like plug a uterm on that to see msdos screen on linu
:=) (via usb cable)
it was cool at the time it existed, i just wonder if it could run fidonet soft
re on the pc side of it, the amiga ram could be used in msdos as highmem, so n
problem with this, i did not have networking, just amiga harddisk file sharein
eq northon command could move files from amiga to the virtual harddisk on the
c side, and visa versa
Sysop: | Nitro |
---|---|
Location: | Portland, OR |
Users: | 4 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 218:21:28 |
Calls: | 139 |
Files: | 752 |
Messages: | 87,387 |