aaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice as
the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton broke
its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice
as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand
Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton broke
its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at
Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice
as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand
Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at
Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the
Tuscan Grand Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
at Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton broke
its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at Sunday's race."
On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the
Tuscan Grand Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
at Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out." >>>>>
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at
Sunday's race."
I'm asking you.
I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to highlight
AT Sunday's race.
You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you
approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain what
you meant by asking the question you did.
On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the >>>>>> Tuscan Grand Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality >>>>>> at Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out." >>>>>>
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at
Sunday's race."
I'm asking you.
I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to highlight
AT Sunday's race.
You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you
approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain what
you meant by asking the question you did.
My point is it was a poorly worded statement.
Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?
Or was something worn at Sunday's race that highlighted police brutality?
Now fuck along off.
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
<https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice >>> as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand >>> Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at >>> Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
at Sunday's race."
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
News <News@Group.Post> wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
<https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice >>>>> as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand >>>>> Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at >>>>> Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out." >>>>>
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport partly
to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down their
throat.
Lewis Hamilton
On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at
the Tuscan Grand Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton >>>>>>> broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
brutality at Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled >>>>>>> out."
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
at Sunday's race."
I'm asking you.
I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to
highlight AT Sunday's race.
You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you
approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain what
you meant by asking the question you did.
My point is it was a poorly worded statement.
And yet I instantly understood what they meant...
...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.
:-)
Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?
No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily dismissed by anyone of even quite modest intelligence.
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
News <News@Group.Post> wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
<https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice >>>>> as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand >>>>> Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at >>>>> Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out." >>>>>
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport partly
to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down their
throat.
Bob.
On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
aaa News <News@Group.Post> wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
aaaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice >>>>>> as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand >>>>>> Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at >>>>>> Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out." >>>>>>
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport partly
to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down their
throat.
Awwww...
...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to bring politics into their sports...
...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.
On 9/15/2020 3:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at >>>>>>>> the Tuscan Grand Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton >>>>>>>> broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
brutality at Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled >>>>>>>> out."
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
at Sunday's race."
I'm asking you.
I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to
highlight AT Sunday's race.
You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you
approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain
what you meant by asking the question you did.
My point is it was a poorly worded statement.
And yet I instantly understood what they meant...
...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.
:-)
Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?
No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily dismissed
by anyone of even quite modest intelligence.
You, for example, were there?
On 9/15/2020 3:40 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
aaa News <News@Group.Post> wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
aaaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
injustice
as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan >>>>>>> Grand
Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton >>>>>>> broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
brutality at
Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled >>>>>>> out."
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport partly
to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down their
throat.
Awwww...
...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
bring politics into their sports...
...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.
As if you care. Moron.
On 2020-09-15 1:06 p.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 3:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against >>>>>>>>> injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at >>>>>>>>> the Tuscan Grand Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
police brutality at Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled >>>>>>>>> out."
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton >>>>>> broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality >>>>>> at Sunday's race."
I'm asking you.
I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to
highlight AT Sunday's race.
You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you
approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain
what you meant by asking the question you did.
My point is it was a poorly worded statement.
And yet I instantly understood what they meant...
...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.
:-)
Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?
No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily dismissed
by anyone of even quite modest intelligence.
You, for example, were there?
No... ...but if there had actually BEEN an incident at the event...
...don't you think it might have made the news?
On 2020-09-15 1:07 p.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 3:40 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
aaa News <News@Group.Post> wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
aaaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
injustice
as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan >>>>>>>> Grand
Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton >>>>>>>> broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
brutality at
Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled >>>>>>>> out."
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport partly
to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down their
throat.
Awwww...
...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
bring politics into their sports...
...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.
As if you care. Moron.
I care much more than you do, apparently.
On 9/15/2020 4:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 1:06 p.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 3:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against >>>>>>>>>> injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at >>>>>>>>>> the Tuscan Grand Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting >>>>>>>>>> police brutality at Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been >>>>>>>>>> ruled out."
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton >>>>>>> broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
brutality at Sunday's race."
I'm asking you.
I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to
highlight AT Sunday's race.
You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you >>>>>> approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain
what you meant by asking the question you did.
My point is it was a poorly worded statement.
And yet I instantly understood what they meant...
...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.
:-)
Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?
No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily dismissed
by anyone of even quite modest intelligence.
You, for example, were there?
No... ...but if there had actually BEEN an incident at the event...
...don't you think it might have made the news?
In Tuscany, placing Tuscany in a poor light?
You do know who runs Tuscany, right?
LMFAO
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:Nevertheless it does demonstrate how careless wording or lack of correct punctuation can completely alter the meaning of a sentence.
On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
-a-a-a-a <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the >>>>>>>> Tuscan Grand Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton >>>>>>>> broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality >>>>>>>> at Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out." >>>>>>>>
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at >>>>> Sunday's race."
I'm asking you.
I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to highlight >>>> AT Sunday's race.
You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you
approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain what
you meant by asking the question you did.
My point is it was a poorly worded statement.
And yet I instantly understood what they meant...
...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.
:-)
Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?
No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily dismissed by
anyone of even quite modest intelligence.
Just saying ...
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
Nevertheless it does demonstrate how careless wording or lack ofWas there police brutality at Sunday's race?
No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily
dismissed by anyone of even quite modest intelligence.
correct punctuation can completely alter the meaning of a sentence.
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice
as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand
Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton broke
its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at
Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
News <News@Group.Post> wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
<https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice >>>>> as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand >>>>> Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at >>>>> Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out." >>>>>
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport partly
to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down their
throat.
'Bye!
--
Shaun.
"Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
in the DSM"
David Melville
This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
Lots of sentences can be misinterpreted...
...but when the context in which this one was stated is taken into
account, this just wasn't one of them.
Did anybody suggest that there was ?
On 2020-09-15 1:41 p.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 4:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 1:06 p.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 3:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:...don't you think it might have made the news?
On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against >>>>>>>>>>> injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions >>>>>>>>>>> at the Tuscan Grand Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether >>>>>>>>>>> Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting >>>>>>>>>>> police brutality at Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been >>>>>>>>>>> ruled out."
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
police brutality at Sunday's race."
I'm asking you.
I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to
highlight AT Sunday's race.
You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you >>>>>>> approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain >>>>>>> what you meant by asking the question you did.
My point is it was a poorly worded statement.
And yet I instantly understood what they meant...
...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.
:-)
Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?
No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily
dismissed by anyone of even quite modest intelligence.
You, for example, were there?
In Tuscany, placing Tuscany in a poor light?
You do know who runs Tuscany, right?
LMFAO
So they're so powerful that they can keep a secret from everyone at the event...
...except Lewis Hamilton?
And... ...what: they "got to him" so that he'd wear the shirt but not
tell a single soul?
Statement: "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
brutality at Sunday's race.
Question: "Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?"
Response: "No..."
Surresponse: "And they "got to him" so that he'd wear the shirt but not
tell a single soul?"
Suggesting what, that HAM has a secret? Has knowledge of brutality at
the event?
You have outlived your usefulness here, and on the internet generally.
FOAD.
On 16/09/2020 15:04, News wrote:
Statement: "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
brutality at Sunday's race.
Not that matters, but that wasn't a statement from the FIA, it was a
report by Andrew Benson, 'Chief F1 writer' for the BBC.
On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
police brutality at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down
their throat.
Awwww...
...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
bring politics into their sports...
...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.
On 9/15/2020 4:52 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 1:41 p.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 4:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 1:06 p.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 3:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:...don't you think it might have made the news?
On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...
aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>
"Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against >>>>>>>>>>>> injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions >>>>>>>>>>>> at the Tuscan Grand Prix.
Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether >>>>>>>>>>>> Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting >>>>>>>>>>>> police brutality at Sunday's race.
An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been >>>>>>>>>>>> ruled out."
Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race? >>>>>>>>>>
...what exactly should the rule be?
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
police brutality at Sunday's race."
I'm asking you.
I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to
highlight AT Sunday's race.
You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if >>>>>>>> you approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please
explain what you meant by asking the question you did.
My point is it was a poorly worded statement.
And yet I instantly understood what they meant...
...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.
:-)
Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?
No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily
dismissed by anyone of even quite modest intelligence.
You, for example, were there?
In Tuscany, placing Tuscany in a poor light?
You do know who runs Tuscany, right?
LMFAO
So they're so powerful that they can keep a secret from everyone at
the event...
...except Lewis Hamilton?
And... ...what: they "got to him" so that he'd wear the shirt but not
tell a single soul?
Statement: "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
brutality at Sunday's race.
Question: "Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?"
Response: "No..."
Surresponse: "And they "got to him" so that he'd wear the shirt but not
tell a single soul?"
Suggesting what, that HAM has a secret? Has knowledge of brutality at
the event?
You have outlived your usefulness here, and on the internet generally.
In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
police brutality at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down
their throat.
Awwww...
...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
bring politics into their sports...
Honestly no.
...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.
It does make me uncomfortable that is true.
I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on
race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
worse. Resentment is building very clear.
Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.
On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
police brutality at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down
their throat.
Awwww...
...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
bring politics into their sports...
Honestly no.
...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.
It does make me uncomfortable that is true.
I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on
race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
worse. Resentment is building very clear.
Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.
Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your
beliefs are not in accord with reality.
And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?
In article <rjtd60$ahh$4@dont-email.me>,
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
police brutality at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down
their throat.
Awwww...
...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
bring politics into their sports...
Honestly no.
...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.
It does make me uncomfortable that is true.
I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on
race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
worse. Resentment is building very clear.
Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.
Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your
beliefs are not in accord with reality.
And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?
Woke is an illness so lets hope so.
On 16/09/2020 15:04, News wrote:
Statement: "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
brutality at Sunday's race.
Not that matters, but that wasn't a statement from the FIA, it was a
report by Andrew Benson, 'Chief F1 writer' for the BBC.
Question: "Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?"
Response: "No..."
Surresponse: "And they "got to him" so that he'd wear the shirt but
not tell a single soul?"
Suggesting what, that HAM has a secret? Has knowledge of brutality at
the event?
You have outlived your usefulness here, and on the internet generally.
FOAD.
On 2020-09-16 9:16 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjtd60$ahh$4@dont-email.me>,
aaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
aaaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
police brutality at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down
their throat.
Awwww...
...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
bring politics into their sports...
Honestly no.
...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.
It does make me uncomfortable that is true.
I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on
race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
worse. Resentment is building very clear.
Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.
Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your
beliefs are not in accord with reality.
And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?
Woke is an illness so lets hope so.
But you didn't say "left woke", which would be a subset of people from
the left, you said "left/woke", which is a construction used to indicate that either word could stand on its own in your sentence.
This was no mistake.
You're one of those idiots who is so certain he is right that anyone who disagrees with you isn't "normal".
On 9/16/2020 12:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-16 9:16 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjtd60$ahh$4@dont-email.me>,
aaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
aaaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
police brutality at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a >>>>>>> proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down >>>>>>> their throat.
Awwww...
...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
bring politics into their sports...
Honestly no.
...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.
It does make me uncomfortable that is true.
I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on >>>>> race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
worse. Resentment is building very clear.
Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.
Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your
beliefs are not in accord with reality.
And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?
Woke is an illness so lets hope so.
But you didn't say "left woke", which would be a subset of people from
the left, you said "left/woke", which is a construction used to
indicate that either word could stand on its own in your sentence.
This was no mistake.
You're one of those idiots who is so certain he is right that anyone
who disagrees with you isn't "normal".
L.M.A.O.
Look in the mirror, much, yafuckingpedant?
On 2020-09-16 9:40 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/16/2020 12:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-16 9:16 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjtd60$ahh$4@dont-email.me>,
aaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
aaaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
police brutality at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a >>>>>>>> proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down >>>>>>>> their throat.
Awwww...
...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to >>>>>>> bring politics into their sports...
Honestly no.
...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you >>>>>>> uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.
It does make me uncomfortable that is true.
I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on >>>>>> race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
worse. Resentment is building very clear.
Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.
Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your
beliefs are not in accord with reality.
And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?
Woke is an illness so lets hope so.
But you didn't say "left woke", which would be a subset of people
from the left, you said "left/woke", which is a construction used to
indicate that either word could stand on its own in your sentence.
This was no mistake.
You're one of those idiots who is so certain he is right that anyone
who disagrees with you isn't "normal".
L.M.A.O.
Look in the mirror, much, yafuckingpedant?
Awww.... ...feeling a little hurt, are you?
On 9/16/2020 12:44 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-16 9:40 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/16/2020 12:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-16 9:16 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjtd60$ahh$4@dont-email.me>,
aaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your >>>>>> beliefs are not in accord with reality.
aaaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting >>>>>>>>>> police brutality at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a >>>>>>>>> proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport >>>>>>>>> partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down >>>>>>>>> their throat.
Awwww...
...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to >>>>>>>> bring politics into their sports...
Honestly no.
...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you >>>>>>>> uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.
It does make me uncomfortable that is true.
I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not
primarily on
race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
worse. Resentment is building very clear.
Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke. >>>>>
And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?
Woke is an illness so lets hope so.
But you didn't say "left woke", which would be a subset of people
from the left, you said "left/woke", which is a construction used to
indicate that either word could stand on its own in your sentence.
This was no mistake.
You're one of those idiots who is so certain he is right that anyone
who disagrees with you isn't "normal".
L.M.A.O.
Look in the mirror, much, yafuckingpedant?
Awww.... ...feeling a little hurt, are you?
Not me, pal. The OP had you dead to rights. Now FOAD.
On 2020-09-16 10:31 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/16/2020 12:44 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-16 9:40 a.m., News wrote:
On 9/16/2020 12:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
On 2020-09-16 9:16 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjtd60$ahh$4@dont-email.me>,
aaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your >>>>>>> beliefs are not in accord with reality.
aaaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether >>>>>>>>>>> Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting >>>>>>>>>>> police brutality at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a >>>>>>>>>> proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport >>>>>>>>>> partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down >>>>>>>>>> their throat.
Awwww...
...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to >>>>>>>>> bring politics into their sports...
Honestly no.
...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you >>>>>>>>> uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.
It does make me uncomfortable that is true.
I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not
primarily on
race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters >>>>>>>> worse. Resentment is building very clear.
Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke. >>>>>>
And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?
Woke is an illness so lets hope so.
But you didn't say "left woke", which would be a subset of people
from the left, you said "left/woke", which is a construction used
to indicate that either word could stand on its own in your sentence. >>>>>
This was no mistake.
You're one of those idiots who is so certain he is right that
anyone who disagrees with you isn't "normal".
L.M.A.O.
Look in the mirror, much, yafuckingpedant?
Awww.... ...feeling a little hurt, are you?
Not me, pal. The OP had you dead to rights. Now FOAD.
Riiiiight.
That's why you have to get the last word.
:-)
In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
Ask FIA.
"Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
police brutality at Sunday's race."
How about -
Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down
their throat.
Awwww...
...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
bring politics into their sports...
Honestly no.
...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.
It does make me uncomfortable that is true.
I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on
race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
worse. Resentment is building very clear.
Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.
It wasn't political. It was a statement of fact and that taking a life is a breach of human right to life laid down in most jurisdictions. In UK Art 2 HRA and USA Amendment 15.
FIA would really confirm being out of touch if they investigated.
On 15/09/2020 21:31, CS wrote:
It wasn't political.-a It was a statement of fact and that taking a life is a breach of human
right to life laid down in most jurisdictions. In UK Art 2 HRA and USA Amendment 15.
FIA would really confirm being out of touch if they investigated.
The 15th Amendment - rCLThe right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or
abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of
servitude.rCY
I know Trump is trying to stop postal voting, but I don't think Hamilton's T-shirt has got anything
to do with that.
Perhaps you mean the 14th Amendment?
On 17/09/2020 11:34 pm, Dex wrote:
On 15/09/2020 21:31, CS wrote:
It wasn't political. It was a statement of fact and that taking a life is a breach of human
right to life laid down in most jurisdictions. In UK Art 2 HRA and USA Amendment 15.
FIA would really confirm being out of touch if they investigated.
Fuck you and your pathetic killfile, ass fucker.The 15th Amendment - rCLThe right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied orYou are aware that 'convicts' or 'ex-convicts' aren't allowed to vote in the US yeah? This
abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of
servitude.rCY
disproportionately affects people of colour as there is a multi-billion dollar a year business
which requires them to be criminalised and then used as slaves.
Just an FYI... I'm over this thread but there are only so many people I can put in my killfile.
(Rule of thumb for killfile for me is ratio of on-topic factual or interesting posts to OT wank.
IOW S/N ratio.)
I know Trump is trying to stop postal voting, but I don't think Hamilton's T-shirt has got anything
to do with that.
Perhaps you mean the 14th Amendment?I'm interested in Formula 1 for the racing and technology. I stopped watching podiums and
interviews a year or two ago as they're increasingly irrelevant to and distract from the on-track
action.
In fact I often find podiums in particular crass and cringe-worthy. I get the whole 'release of
tension' thing but some things should be done in private IMO.
--
Shaun.
"Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
in the DSM"
David Melville
This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
Just an FYI... I'm over this thread but there are only so many people I can put in my killfile.
(Rule of thumb for killfile for me is ratio of on-topic factual or interesting posts to OT wank.
IOW S/N ratio.)
my killfile.
killfile for me
--
Shaun.
"Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
in the DSM"
David Melville
This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
| Sysop: | Nitro |
|---|---|
| Location: | Portland, OR |
| Users: | 7 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 01:42:02 |
| Calls: | 161 |
| Files: | 755 |
| Messages: | 91,158 |