Another ground-breaking step by British Rowing
The new British Rowing Selection Policy for 2021rCo2024 was recently published (https://www.britishrowing.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/British-Rowing-Selection-Policy-2021-2024.pdf ), and I simply could not refrain from expressing my admiration for such a delightful document made by the wise and honest people who govern the lives of thousands of British rowers.
My main impression after reading this document is that it is excellently written and goes to its essence straight away in Section 2: rCLSubjective nature of selection decisionsrCY, which is without doubt the finest work achieved by British Rowing so far. In p2.1, it was elegantly phrased that: rCLBritish Rowing does not consider it desirable to select crews based on hard-edged criteriarCY. Even better, in p2.2: rCLAs such, British Rowing recognises that selection decisions should be made on a subjective basis, taking into account a variety of factors.rCY In essence, there are no rCLhard-edgesrCY anymore: our athletes just need to rCLbe a fit and proper person to represent British RowingrCY (p10.1.15). The most logical next step would be to award medals at National regattas based on the subjective unanimous decisions of a selection panel, which would automatically reject those arrogant and selfish enough to follow their own way and pursue their individual goals.
Consequently, the rowing program must be changed to meet our standards: all singles events must be eliminated, because rowing is a team sport and we have no need for any of the selfish individualists that call themselves rCLsingle-scullersrCY. If they do not want to share our team-working approach, they must go to other sports like athletics or swimming. We are already moving in this direction, slowly, but steadily: for many years we have refrained from sending our single-scullers to World regattas of various levels. We believe FISA would support our proposal and if not, we will push it through our powerful lobby there.
We can go further still - why do we even need races, if medals are not related to their results? This year, we already made a decisive step in this direction: we cancelled most races for thousands of British rowers for the whole year. All those irresponsible Europeans competed at various National and continental regattas, putting the lives of their athletes and coaches at deadly risk, but we have shown to the whole World the best example of wise team management as a leading nation in the development of our sport.
After we eliminate all the hectic and unpredictable regattas from our life, we wonrCOt need to train for them anymore! Really, what a waste of our time and effort; all those boring miles on the water and on the erg, heavy sweating and painrCa Just imagine how much time and energy we will have for our youth to take part in teamwork commitments and networking!
The next step would be the removal of all coaches as a class: we donrCOt really need any of those overly ambitious people, who are obsessively studying the complicated details of rowing technique, physiology, biomechanics, training planning, etc. After all, we already appoint National coaches subjectively without any criteria, so we know much better what we need: just excellent team-players with good knowledge of our policies. This would also be beneficial due to the removal of all those nasty sport scientists, who still dare to disturb us with their formulas and charts.
And finally, without training and coaching, we wonrCOt need rowing clubs anymore: they are just wasted space and expenses, which could be more productively used for the meetings of our selection panels and teamworking worships. Savings on these resources would mean that more taxpayers money could flow into the pockets of British Rowing employees, which would allow them to further rCydeveloprCO our sport.
I would like to congratulate British Rowing with another brilliant mile-stone document, though it is a pity that the great team-workers who authored it were not able to overcome their modesty to reveal their names. Unfortunately, I cannot conquer my arrogance and resist the selfish temptation to put my name under this short note, putting me to shame compared to those excellent anonymous authors from British Rowing.
Yours faithfully,
Dr Valery Kleshnev, 29 12 2020
On 29/12/2020 10:53, Dr. Valery Kleshnev wrote:To be fair - 11.12 then goes on to state a long list of criteria that should be taken into account - all fairly hard-edged.
Another ground-breaking step by British Rowing
The new British Rowing Selection Policy for 2021rCo2024 was recently published (https://www.britishrowing.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/British-Rowing-Selection-Policy-2021-2024.pdf ), and I simply could not refrain from expressing my admiration for such a delightful document made by the wise and honest people who govern the lives of thousands of British rowers.
My main impression after reading this document is that it is excellently written and goes to its essence straight away in Section 2: rCLSubjective nature of selection decisionsrCY, which is without doubt the finest work achieved by British Rowing so far. In p2.1, it was elegantly phrased that: rCLBritish Rowing does not consider it desirable to select crews based on hard-edged criteriarCY. Even better, in p2.2: rCLAs such, British Rowing recognises that selection decisions should be made on a subjective basis, taking into account a variety of factors.rCY In essence, there are no rCLhard-edgesrCY anymore: our athletes just need to rCLbe a fit and proper person to represent British RowingrCY (p10.1.15). The most logical next step would be to award medals at National regattas based on the subjective unanimous decisions of a selection panel, which would automatically reject those arrogant and selfish enough to follow their own way and pursue their individual goals.
Consequently, the rowing program must be changed to meet our standards: all singles events must be eliminated, because rowing is a team sport and we have no need for any of the selfish individualists that call themselves rCLsingle-scullersrCY. If they do not want to share our team-working approach, they must go to other sports like athletics or swimming. We are already moving in this direction, slowly, but steadily: for many years we have refrained from sending our single-scullers to World regattas of various levels. We believe FISA would support our proposal and if not, we will push it through our powerful lobby there.
We can go further still - why do we even need races, if medals are not related to their results? This year, we already made a decisive step in this direction: we cancelled most races for thousands of British rowers for the whole year. All those irresponsible Europeans competed at various National and continental regattas, putting the lives of their athletes and coaches at deadly risk, but we have shown to the whole World the best example of wise team management as a leading nation in the development of our sport.
After we eliminate all the hectic and unpredictable regattas from our life, we wonrCOt need to train for them anymore! Really, what a waste of our time and effort; all those boring miles on the water and on the erg, heavy sweating and painrCa Just imagine how much time and energy we will have for our youth to take part in teamwork commitments and networking!
The next step would be the removal of all coaches as a class: we donrCOt really need any of those overly ambitious people, who are obsessively studying the complicated details of rowing technique, physiology, biomechanics, training planning, etc. After all, we already appoint National coaches subjectively without any criteria, so we know much better what we need: just excellent team-players with good knowledge of our policies. This would also be beneficial due to the removal of all those nasty sport scientists, who still dare to disturb us with their formulas and charts.
And finally, without training and coaching, we wonrCOt need rowing clubs anymore: they are just wasted space and expenses, which could be more productively used for the meetings of our selection panels and teamworking worships. Savings on these resources would mean that more taxpayers money could flow into the pockets of British Rowing employees, which would allow them to further rCydeveloprCO our sport.
I would like to congratulate British Rowing with another brilliant mile-stone document, though it is a pity that the great team-workers who authored it were not able to overcome their modesty to reveal their names. Unfortunately, I cannot conquer my arrogance and resist the selfish temptation to put my name under this short note, putting me to shame compared to those excellent anonymous authors from British Rowing.
Yours faithfully,
Dr Valery Kleshnev, 29 12 2020
Hi Valery -
I do like your style!
Are you saying that GBR selection will, in future, depend less upon boat-moving performance & more upon how well the athletes get on with coaches and selectors?
And, is the science of rowing to take a back seat?
Those would be bold steps indeed - backwards into the long distant past when, for instance, points were awarded in women's rowing for style as
well as for performance. Or to those less distant days of the "coaching couch" & (less problematic) of a female team official baring her breasts before Roman Catholic priests while changing her kit for a team photo.
In the first line of your final paragraph you may have made a small
spelling error? Shouldn't that be Mill-stone, not Mile-stone?
Perhaps we don't even need to row? Just preserve the immaculate
conception that is British Rowing? I guess it will retain its
witch-hunters - the vindictive persecutors of those who dare to coach juniors?
Just asking - for a friend, you understand.
Wishing you, & all, a Happy New 2021 -
Carl
--
Carl Douglas Racing Shells -
Fine Small-Boats/AeRoWing Low-drag Riggers/Advanced Accessories
Write: Harris Boatyard, Laleham Reach, Chertsey KT16 8RP, UK
Find: tinyurl.com/2tqujf
Email: ca...@carldouglasrowing.com Tel: +44(0)1932-570946 Fax: -563682
URLs: carldouglasrowing.com & now on Facebook @ CarlDouglasRacingShells
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
| Sysop: | Nitro |
|---|---|
| Location: | Portland, OR |
| Users: | 3 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 02:44:20 |
| Calls: | 136 |
| Files: | 751 |
| Messages: | 89,385 |