Benson - what would he know, eh ?
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
substance?
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a statement
you'll stand behind.
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a statement
you'll stand behind.
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?
On 25/01/2022 10:17 am, Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?
Laying it all out clearly for all but the most-skewed.
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a statement
you'll stand behind.
On 2022-01-24 10:17 p.m., geoff wrote:
On 25/01/2022 10:17 am, Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
substance?
Laying it all out clearly for all but the most-skewed.
And yet you won't commit.
Got it.
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a statement
you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an intelligent
adult.
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 10:17 p.m., geoff wrote:
On 25/01/2022 10:17 am, Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
substance?
Laying it all out clearly for all but the most-skewed.
And yet you won't commit.
Got it.
Got what Alan? After all the mealy mouthed, vague, non-committal
half-claims you have made on this subject... yet another meaningless
comment.
Not shocked.
On 2022-01-24 11:27 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 10:17 p.m., geoff wrote:
On 25/01/2022 10:17 am, Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?
Laying it all out clearly for all but the most-skewed.
And yet you won't commit.
Got it.
Got what Alan? After all the mealy mouthed, vague, non-committal half-claims you have made on this subject... yet another meaningless comment.
Not shocked.
And yet you've contributed...
...what to this thread?
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
statement you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an intelligent
adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson added to the discussion a second time.
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
statement you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an intelligent
adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson added to the
discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it out for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.
Ducked again.
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was
of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
statement you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson added to
the discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it out
for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.
Ducked again.
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was
of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
statement you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson added to
the discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it out
for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.
Ducked again.
Liar, again.
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was
of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
statement you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson added to
the discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it out
for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.
Ducked again.
On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that
was of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a statement you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel
here... ...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson
added to the discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it
out for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.
Ducked again.
Liar, again.
Nope.
A generality about what an article does ("it adds perspective")
doesn't answer the question I asked.
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that
was of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
statement you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel
here... ...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson
added to the discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it
out for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.
Ducked again.
Liar, again.
Nope.
A generality about what an article does ("it adds perspective")
doesn't answer the question I asked.
Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..
...when did you ask me any such question?
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was
of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
statement you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel here...
...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson added to
the discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it out
for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.
Ducked again.
In the interests of understanding how your pathetic little mind works;
how can someone duck a question they have not previously been asked?
On 2022-01-25 9:08 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion
that was of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually
making a statement you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel
here... ...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson
added to the discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to
work it out for yourself. It adds perspective; something
you lack.
Ducked again.
Liar, again.
Nope.
A generality about what an article does ("it adds perspective")
doesn't answer the question I asked.
Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..
...when did you ask me any such question?
Implicitly when you replied with:
"I guess it depends on how close minded you are."
to my post asking:
"What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
substance?"
Your answer to that question implies you have reached conclusions
about what he had to say.
So here's another chance:
What conclusions did you reach?
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 9:08 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion
that was of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually
making a statement you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel
here... ...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson
added to the discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to
work it out for yourself. It adds perspective; something
you lack.
Ducked again.
Liar, again.
Nope.
A generality about what an article does ("it adds perspective")
doesn't answer the question I asked.
Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..
...when did you ask me any such question?
Implicitly when you replied with:
"I guess it depends on how close minded you are."
to my post asking:
"What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
substance?"
Lol, what utter bollocks.
Not only are you a lying little cunt you are a fucking retard.
On 2022-01-25 9:06 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that
was of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a statement you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel
here... ...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson
added to the discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it
out for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.
Ducked again.
In the interests of understanding how your pathetic little mind
works; how can someone duck a question they have not previously
been asked?
I asked a question:
"What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
substance?"
That was the entirety of my text in the post, and you replied:
"I guess it depends on how close minded you are."
But now you want to duck on explaining what you meant.
On 2022-01-25 9:18 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 9:08 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion
that was of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually
making a statement you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital
weasel here... ...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of
an intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think
Benson added to the discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike
you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to
work it out for yourself. It adds perspective; something
you lack.
Ducked again.
Liar, again.
Nope.
A generality about what an article does ("it adds
perspective") doesn't answer the question I asked.
Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..
...when did you ask me any such question?
Implicitly when you replied with:
"I guess it depends on how close minded you are."
to my post asking:
"What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?"
Lol, what utter bollocks.
Not only are you a lying little cunt you are a fucking retard.
Are you claiming you were addressing some other text in my post?
If not, then you were responding to my question.
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 9:06 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that
was of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually making a
statement you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital weasel
here... ...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of an
intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think Benson
added to the discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to work it
out for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.
Ducked again.
In the interests of understanding how your pathetic little mind
works; how can someone duck a question they have not previously
been asked?
I asked a question:
"What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
substance?"
Not of me, you lying little cunt.
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 9:18 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 9:08 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion
that was of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you actually
making a statement you'll stand behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital
weasel here... ...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something worthy of
an intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think
Benson added to the discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything, unlike
you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the intelligence to
work it out for yourself. It adds perspective; something
you lack.
Ducked again.
Liar, again.
Nope.
A generality about what an article does ("it adds
perspective") doesn't answer the question I asked.
Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..
...when did you ask me any such question?
Implicitly when you replied with:
"I guess it depends on how close minded you are."
to my post asking:
"What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any
substance?"
Lol, what utter bollocks.
Not only are you a lying little cunt you are a fucking retard.
Are you claiming you were addressing some other text in my post?
If not, then you were responding to my question.
I responded to your post.
You did not ask the question of me therefore to claim I was ducking it
was a blatant and rather stupid lie, wasn't it?
Now you want to pretend you don't know how Usenet works.
On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 10:28:51 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
Now you want to pretend you don't know how Usenet works.
you fucking goof
On 2022-01-25 9:25 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 9:18 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 9:08 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the
discussion that was of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you
are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you
actually making a statement you'll stand
behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital
weasel here... ...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something
worthy of an intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think
Benson added to the discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything,
unlike you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the
intelligence to work it out for yourself. It adds perspective; something you lack.
Ducked again.
Liar, again.
Nope.
A generality about what an article does ("it adds
perspective") doesn't answer the question I asked.
Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..
...when did you ask me any such question?
Implicitly when you replied with:
"I guess it depends on how close minded you are."
to my post asking:
"What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of
any substance?"
Lol, what utter bollocks.
Not only are you a lying little cunt you are a fucking retard.
Are you claiming you were addressing some other text in my post?
If not, then you were responding to my question.
I responded to your post.
You did not ask the question of me therefore to claim I was ducking
it was a blatant and rather stupid lie, wasn't it?
Now you want to pretend you don't know how Usenet works.
Now you want to pretend you don't know how Usenet works.
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 9:25 a.m., Bigbird wrote:https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 9:18 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 9:08 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the
discussion that was of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded you
are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you
actually making a statement you'll stand
behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed non-commital
weasel here... ...here have your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something
worthy of an intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you think
Benson added to the discussion a second time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything,
unlike you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the
intelligence to work it out for yourself. It adds
perspective; something you lack.
Ducked again.
Liar, again.
Nope.
A generality about what an article does ("it adds
perspective") doesn't answer the question I asked.
Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..
...when did you ask me any such question?
Implicitly when you replied with:
"I guess it depends on how close minded you are."
to my post asking:
"What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of
any substance?"
Lol, what utter bollocks.
Not only are you a lying little cunt you are a fucking retard.
Are you claiming you were addressing some other text in my post?
If not, then you were responding to my question.
I responded to your post.
You did not ask the question of me therefore to claim I was ducking
it was a blatant and rather stupid lie, wasn't it?
Now you want to pretend you don't know how Usenet works.
Lol, you truly are a fuckwit.
I asked a question...
...and you answered.
On 2022-01-26 2:44 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 9:25 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 9:18 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 9:08 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 8:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-25 4:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 11:24 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 1:50 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
Alan wrote:
On 2022-01-24 12:29 p.m., geoff wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/60007031
geoff
What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was of any substance?
I guess it depends on how close minded
you are.
What it clearly doesn't depend on is you
actually making a statement you'll stand
behind.
Hah!
Coming from the most mealy mouthed
non-commital weasel here... ...here have
your biscuit.
Here's a challenge for you; say something
worthy of an intelligent adult.
I already have.
But I notice you've ducked stating what you
think Benson added to the discussion a second
time.
You're lying, again, I haven't ducked anything,
unlike you.
...but I'll tell you since you lack the
intelligence to work it out for yourself. It
adds perspective; something you lack.
Ducked again.
Liar, again.
Nope.
A generality about what an article does ("it adds perspective") doesn't answer the question I asked.
Not only is that utter bullshit, you lying twat, but..
...when did you ask me any such question?
Implicitly when you replied with:
"I guess it depends on how close minded you are."
to my post asking:
"What do you imagine he added to the discussion that was
of any substance?"
Lol, what utter bollocks.
Not only are you a lying little cunt you are a fucking
retard.
Are you claiming you were addressing some other text in my
post?
If not, then you were responding to my question.
I responded to your post.
You did not ask the question of me therefore to claim I was
ducking it was a blatant and rather stupid lie, wasn't it?
Now you want to pretend you don't know how Usenet works.
Lol, you truly are a fuckwit.
I asked a question...
...and you answered.
| Sysop: | Nitro |
|---|---|
| Location: | Portland, OR |
| Users: | 3 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 01:53:05 |
| Calls: | 136 |
| Files: | 751 |
| Messages: | 89,379 |