https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended"However, the latest version of the regulations, issued today sees Article 55.13 state that: "If the clerk of the course considers it safe to do so, and the message 'LAPPED CARS MAY NOW OVERTAKE' has been sent to all Competitors using the official messaging system, all cars that have been lapped by the leader will be required to pass the cars on the lead lap and the safety car"."
Cheers
Geoff
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave absolutely no room at
all for misinterpretation.
geoff
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave absolutely no room at
all for misinterpretation.
geoff
IsnrCOt that what the revision does?
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave absolutely no room at
all for misinterpretation.
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave absolutely no room
at all for misinterpretation.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 15:21:41 +1300, geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org>
wrote:
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave absolutely no room at
all for misinterpretation.
That's what the new ruling says "all cars that have been lapped by
the leader will be required to pass the cars on the lead lap and the
safety car"."
But I can't see the ambiguity in "ANY". "ANY" car that has been
lapped means "EVERY" car that has been lapped means "ALL" cars that
have been lapped. No way can it be interpreted as "SOME", or "THOSE
THAT ARE IN THE WAY OF VER".
Perhaps Australians struggle with English.
I don't know that I can regain the interest this season.
Quote : "Article 48.12 of the 2021
In article <YPudnYaBt6X_Oq7_nZ2dnUU7-QPNnZ2d@giganews.com>, geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org says...
Quote : "Article 48.12 of the 2021
2022 Regulations, article 55.13 says 'all'.
On 18/03/2022 1:43 am, AnthonyL wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 15:21:41 +1300, geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org>
wrote:
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave absolutely no room at >>> all for misinterpretation.
That's what the new ruling says "all cars that have been lapped by
the leader will be required to pass the cars on the lead lap and the
safety car"."
But I can't see the ambiguity in "ANY". "ANY" car that has been
lapped means "EVERY" car that has been lapped means "ALL" cars that
have been lapped. No way can it be interpreted as "SOME", or "THOSE
THAT ARE IN THE WAY OF VER".
Perhaps Australians struggle with English.
I don't know that I can regain the interest this season.
Yeah Ozzie do struggle with English, just like Yanks. They can't spell
words like 'labour', for sterters.
Quote : "Article 48.12 of the 2021 Sporting regulations read: "If the
clerk of the course considers it safe to do so, and the message 'LAPPED
CARS MAY NOW OVERTAKE' has been sent to all Competitors via the official messaging system, any cars that have been lapped by the leader will be required to pass the cars on the lead lap and the safety car."
Looks like that says " ...any cars that have been lapped by the leader
..." to me.
Yes that works with " ...will be required ..", but 'all' would have been firmer.
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
On 18/03/2022 1:43 am, AnthonyL wrote:ThatrCOs what 53.13 says.
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 15:21:41 +1300, geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org>
wrote:
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave absolutely no room at >>>> all for misinterpretation.
That's what the new ruling says "all cars that have been lapped by
the leader will be required to pass the cars on the lead lap and the
safety car"."
But I can't see the ambiguity in "ANY". "ANY" car that has been
lapped means "EVERY" car that has been lapped means "ALL" cars that
have been lapped. No way can it be interpreted as "SOME", or "THOSE
THAT ARE IN THE WAY OF VER".
Perhaps Australians struggle with English.
I don't know that I can regain the interest this season.
Yeah Ozzie do struggle with English, just like Yanks. They can't spell
words like 'labour', for sterters.
Quote : "Article 48.12 of the 2021 Sporting regulations read: "If the
clerk of the course considers it safe to do so, and the message 'LAPPED
CARS MAY NOW OVERTAKE' has been sent to all Competitors via the official
messaging system, any cars that have been lapped by the leader will be
required to pass the cars on the lead lap and the safety car."
Looks like that says " ...any cars that have been lapped by the leader
..." to me.
Yes that works with " ...will be required ..", but 'all' would have been
firmer.
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended to mean "all".
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:IsnrCOt that what the revision does?
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave absolutely no room
at all for misinterpretation.
geoff
geoff
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended to mean "all".
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:IsnrCOt that what the revision does?
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave absolutely no room
at all for misinterpretation.
geoff
geoff
And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being the '22.
On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended to mean "all".
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:IsnrCOt that what the revision does?
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave absolutely no
room at all for misinterpretation.
geoff
geoff
And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to' bit.
geoff
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:11:10 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave absolutely no
room at all for misinterpretation.
geoff
IsnrCOt that what the revision does?
I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended to mean "all".
Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being the '22.geoff
And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to' bit.
geoff
I stil dont believe that there was nything wrong with the original
rule that anyone with a basic understanding of English would have
found confusing. it was a smoke screen for a stupid F**k up.
alister wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:11:10 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being the '22.
On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended to mean "all".
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:IsnrCOt that what the revision does?
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave absolutely no >>>>>>> room at all for misinterpretation.
geoff
geoff
And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to' bit.
geoff
I stil dont believe that there was nything wrong with the original
rule that anyone with a basic understanding of English would have
found confusing. it was a smoke screen for a stupid F**k up.
IIRC the FIA never relied on it but RBR tried to use it to obfuscate
the regulation not being applied correctly but rather used in their
favour.
On 3/19/2022 9:08 AM, Bigbird wrote:
alister wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:11:10 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being the '22.
On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended to mean "all".
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:IsnrCOt that what the revision does?
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave absolutely no >>>>>>>> room at all for misinterpretation.
geoff
geoff
And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to' bit.
geoff
I stil dont believe that there was nything wrong with the original
rule that anyone with a basic understanding of English would have
found confusing. it was a smoke screen for a stupid F**k up.
IIRC the FIA never relied on it but RBR tried to use it to obfuscate
the regulation not being applied correctly but rather used in their
favour.
How many safety car laps did it take to clear the Alpha Tauri?
Half the remaining laps? And only then reshuffle the pack?
FIA remains FUBAR.
On 3/19/2022 9:08 AM, Bigbird wrote:
alister wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:11:10 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave
absolutely no room at all for misinterpretation.
geoff
IsnrCOt that what the revision does?
I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended to mean
"all".
geoff
And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being the '22.
The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to' bit.
geoff
I stil dont believe that there was nything wrong with the original
rule that anyone with a basic understanding of English would have
found confusing. it was a smoke screen for a stupid F**k up.
IIRC the FIA never relied on it but RBR tried to use it to obfuscate
the regulation not being applied correctly but rather used in their
favour.
How many safety car laps did it take to clear the Alpha Tauri?
Half the remaining laps? And only then reshuffle the pack?
FIA remains FUBAR.
News wrote:
On 3/19/2022 9:08 AM, Bigbird wrote:https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
alister wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:11:10 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being the '22.I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended to meanIsnrCOt that what the revision does?
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave
absolutely no room at all for misinterpretation.
geoff
"all".
geoff
And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to' bit.
geoff
I stil dont believe that there was nything wrong with the original
rule that anyone with a basic understanding of English would have
found confusing. it was a smoke screen for a stupid F**k up.
IIRC the FIA never relied on it but RBR tried to use it to obfuscate
the regulation not being applied correctly but rather used in their
favour.
How many safety car laps did it take to clear the Alpha Tauri?
I'm sure you can find out if you put your mind to it...
Half the remaining laps? And only then reshuffle the pack?
...or maybe it is beyond your limitations...
FIA remains FUBAR.
I am not going to disagree.
On 3/21/2022 4:09 PM, Bigbird wrote:
News wrote:
On 3/19/2022 9:08 AM, Bigbird wrote:
alister wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:11:10 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave absolutely no room at all for misinterpretation.
geoff
IsnrCOt that what the revision does?
I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended to mean
"all".
geoff
And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being the '22.
The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to' bit.
geoff
I stil dont believe that there was nything wrong with the
original rule that anyone with a basic understanding of
English would have found confusing. it was a smoke screen for
a stupid F**k up.
IIRC the FIA never relied on it but RBR tried to use it to
obfuscate the regulation not being applied correctly but rather
used in their favour.
How many safety car laps did it take to clear the Alpha Tauri?
I'm sure you can find out if you put your mind to it...
Half the remaining laps? And only then reshuffle the pack?
...or maybe it is beyond your limitations...
FIA remains FUBAR.
I am not going to disagree.
First two were rhetorical, setting up the latter.
News wrote:
On 3/21/2022 4:09 PM, Bigbird wrote:
News wrote:
On 3/19/2022 9:08 AM, Bigbird wrote:https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
alister wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:11:10 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being the '22.I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended to meanIsnrCOt that what the revision does?
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to leave
absolutely no room at all for misinterpretation.
geoff
"all".
geoff
And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to' bit.
geoff
I stil dont believe that there was nything wrong with the
original rule that anyone with a basic understanding of
English would have found confusing. it was a smoke screen for
a stupid F**k up.
IIRC the FIA never relied on it but RBR tried to use it to
obfuscate the regulation not being applied correctly but rather
used in their favour.
How many safety car laps did it take to clear the Alpha Tauri?
I'm sure you can find out if you put your mind to it...
Half the remaining laps? And only then reshuffle the pack?
...or maybe it is beyond your limitations...
FIA remains FUBAR.
I am not going to disagree.
First two were rhetorical, setting up the latter.
...which was a non-sequitur.
On 3/22/2022 5:58 AM, Bigbird wrote:
News wrote:
On 3/21/2022 4:09 PM, Bigbird wrote:
News wrote:
On 3/19/2022 9:08 AM, Bigbird wrote:
alister wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:11:10 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to
leave absolutely no room at all for
misinterpretation.
geoff
IsnrCOt that what the revision does?
I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended to
mean "all".
geoff
And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being the '22.
The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to'
bit.
geoff
I stil dont believe that there was nything wrong with the original rule that anyone with a basic understanding of
English would have found confusing. it was a smoke screen
for a stupid F**k up.
IIRC the FIA never relied on it but RBR tried to use it to obfuscate the regulation not being applied correctly but
rather used in their favour.
How many safety car laps did it take to clear the Alpha Tauri?
I'm sure you can find out if you put your mind to it...
Half the remaining laps? And only then reshuffle the pack?
...or maybe it is beyond your limitations...
FIA remains FUBAR.
I am not going to disagree.
First two were rhetorical, setting up the latter.
...which was a non-sequitur.
Only to the illiterate and ignorant. Take a bow.
News wrote:
On 3/22/2022 5:58 AM, Bigbird wrote:
News wrote:
On 3/21/2022 4:09 PM, Bigbird wrote:
News wrote:
On 3/19/2022 9:08 AM, Bigbird wrote:https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
alister wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:11:10 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being the '22.I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended toIsnrCOt that what the revision does?
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to
leave absolutely no room at all for
misinterpretation.
geoff
mean "all".
geoff
And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to'
bit.
geoff
I stil dont believe that there was nything wrong with the
original rule that anyone with a basic understanding of
English would have found confusing. it was a smoke screen
for a stupid F**k up.
IIRC the FIA never relied on it but RBR tried to use it to
obfuscate the regulation not being applied correctly but
rather used in their favour.
How many safety car laps did it take to clear the Alpha Tauri?
I'm sure you can find out if you put your mind to it...
Half the remaining laps? And only then reshuffle the pack?
...or maybe it is beyond your limitations...
FIA remains FUBAR.
I am not going to disagree.
First two were rhetorical, setting up the latter.
...which was a non-sequitur.
Only to the illiterate and ignorant. Take a bow.
I would not want to deprive you of the honour.
There was no earlier opportunity to safely unlap the lapped cars.
This was explained at the time in a manner that anyone but the most
ignorant and/or illiterate could understand...
...so go ahead and take that bow now.
On 3/22/2022 2:23 PM, Bigbird wrote:
News wrote:
On 3/22/2022 5:58 AM, Bigbird wrote:
News wrote:
On 3/21/2022 4:09 PM, Bigbird wrote:
News wrote:
On 3/19/2022 9:08 AM, Bigbird wrote:
alister wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:11:10 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended
Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to
leave absolutely no room at all for misinterpretation.
geoff
IsnrCOt that what the revision does?
I find "any" a little vague, if it is intended
to mean "all".
geoff
And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being the
'22.
The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to'
bit.
geoff
I stil dont believe that there was nything wrong with
the original rule that anyone with a basic
understanding of English would have found confusing.
it was a smoke screen for a stupid F**k up.
IIRC the FIA never relied on it but RBR tried to use it
to obfuscate the regulation not being applied correctly
but rather used in their favour.
How many safety car laps did it take to clear the Alpha
Tauri?
I'm sure you can find out if you put your mind to it...
Half the remaining laps? And only then reshuffle the pack?
...or maybe it is beyond your limitations...
FIA remains FUBAR.
I am not going to disagree.
First two were rhetorical, setting up the latter.
...which was a non-sequitur.
Only to the illiterate and ignorant. Take a bow.
I would not want to deprive you of the honour.
There was no earlier opportunity to safely unlap the lapped cars.
This was explained at the time in a manner that anyone but the most ignorant and/or illiterate could understand...
...so go ahead and take that bow now.
Illustrating you're still clueless, after all these years.
But go ahead...
News wrote:
On 3/22/2022 2:23 PM, Bigbird wrote:
News wrote:
On 3/22/2022 5:58 AM, Bigbird wrote:
News wrote:
On 3/21/2022 4:09 PM, Bigbird wrote:
News wrote:
On 3/19/2022 9:08 AM, Bigbird wrote:https://www.pitpass.com/71968/Rule-on-lapped-cars-amended >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
alister wrote:
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 13:11:10 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 19/03/2022 6:33 am, alister wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:22:29 +1300, geoff wrote:
On 17/03/2022 8:47 pm, Sir Tim wrote:
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
On 17/03/2022 6:46 am, Geoff May wrote:
Yes, I had been reading the 21 regs as being theI find "any" a little vague, if it is intendedIsnrCOt that what the revision does?Cheers
Geoff
Surely 'ANY' should have been "ALL". Just to
leave absolutely no room at all for
misinterpretation.
geoff
to mean "all".
geoff
And the new rule says ALL - that was the change
'22.
The 'any' bit didn't fit well with the 'required to'
bit.
geoff
I stil dont believe that there was nything wrong with
the original rule that anyone with a basic
understanding of English would have found confusing.
it was a smoke screen for a stupid F**k up.
IIRC the FIA never relied on it but RBR tried to use it
to obfuscate the regulation not being applied correctly
but rather used in their favour.
How many safety car laps did it take to clear the Alpha
Tauri?
I'm sure you can find out if you put your mind to it...
Half the remaining laps? And only then reshuffle the pack?
...or maybe it is beyond your limitations...
FIA remains FUBAR.
I am not going to disagree.
First two were rhetorical, setting up the latter.
...which was a non-sequitur.
Only to the illiterate and ignorant. Take a bow.
I would not want to deprive you of the honour.
There was no earlier opportunity to safely unlap the lapped cars.
This was explained at the time in a manner that anyone but the most
ignorant and/or illiterate could understand...
...so go ahead and take that bow now.
Illustrating you're still clueless, after all these years.
But go ahead...
Well what a comprehensive rebuttal...
...not quite as gracious as capitulation but close enough.
| Sysop: | Nitro |
|---|---|
| Location: | Portland, OR |
| Users: | 4 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 218:36:28 |
| Calls: | 139 |
| Files: | 752 |
| Messages: | 87,388 |