People have this weird idea in their heads that I'm "anti-Hamilton".
Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.
Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.
Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where Hamilton is
so much as mentioned:
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>
Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.
On 12/04/2022, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where Hamilton is
so much as mentioned:
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>
Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.
Over the last decades I visited this group on and off. After a long
period I'm back and enjoying it quite a lot, perhaps even more than
before. Except your posts. If you were just anti-Hamilton, it wouldn't
be a problem, but from what I'm seeing in just a week since my return
you basically love to antagonise every single post. Including even my
post about the Red Bull being an understeering hog that is eating the
front tyres. All you needed to do was listen to one of the many radio messages from Max complaining about it. Or read one of the three links I showed you, but that you selectively ignored, because you had already fulfilled your antagonising desires.
I see two possible reasons for that:
1. You're a troll wannabe, even if very poor at that.
2. You're not a troll but only enjoy antagonising others.
None of which interest me anymore, even if I'm all for freedom of speech
and against central moderation. Basically you're annoying to read and my
next course of action is probably going to be using a killfile to filter
out all posts from you. This is the beauty of Usenet.
I had waited before making a post like this, because I was giving you
the benefit of doubt, since I've returned to RASF1 only last week.
However, seeing so many posts from the regulars here basically
confirming my thoughts made it clear to me.
If you're open to accept some constructive criticism and if your problem
is just about antagonism (I've been there, done that), allow yourself to
find some posts you agree with and give positive feedback, even if you
add something else to the discussion. It's a good exercise.
On 12/04/2022, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where Hamilton is
so much as mentioned:
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>
Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.
Over the last decades I visited this group on and off. After a long
period I'm back and enjoying it quite a lot, perhaps even more than
before. Except your posts. If you were just anti-Hamilton, it wouldn't
be a problem, but from what I'm seeing in just a week since my return
you basically love to antagonise every single post. Including even my
post about the Red Bull being an understeering hog that is eating the
front tyres. All you needed to do was listen to one of the many radio messages from Max complaining about it. Or read one of the three links I showed you, but that you selectively ignored, because you had already fulfilled your antagonising desires.
I see two possible reasons for that:
1. You're a troll wannabe, even if very poor at that.
2. You're not a troll but only enjoy antagonising others.
None of which interest me anymore, even if I'm all for freedom of speech
and against central moderation. Basically you're annoying to read and my
next course of action is probably going to be using a killfile to filter
out all posts from you. This is the beauty of Usenet.
I had waited before making a post like this, because I was giving you
the benefit of doubt, since I've returned to RASF1 only last week.
However, seeing so many posts from the regulars here basically
confirming my thoughts made it clear to me.
If you're open to accept some constructive criticism and if your problem
is just about antagonism (I've been there, done that), allow yourself to
find some posts you agree with and give positive feedback, even if you
add something else to the discussion. It's a good exercise.
Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where Hamilton is so much as mentioned:
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>
Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.
What is my "problem" as you see it?
Sadly, although Alan is in my killfile, I still end up with all the texts responding to him.
I do wish everyone would just let his posts alone and not respond. I know, I know. Not going to
happen.
I can mark the thread when they devolve into petty argument, but I am reluctant to killfile those
who do respond to Alan, as they sometimes have interesting things to say.
On 13/04/2022 8:21 am, Alan wrote:
Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where Hamilton is
so much as mentioned:
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>
Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.
Not going out of my way to prove what to already absolutely clear to everybody here.
How about the suggestions, at every opportunity, such as the 'car
designed for him', "team orders', inferior team-mate or opposition, etc, etc, etc.
And never acknowledging poor results sometimes due to the likes of bad
luck wrt car reliability, safety car timing, actions of other drivers,
etc, etc, etc again. And now 'team orders' the other way around - ha ha !
Always predictable, repeated, and-a seemingly inevitable. And never the--- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
same focus being on other drivers.
geoff
On 13/04/2022 10:00 am, Darryl Johnson wrote:
Sadly, although Alan is in my killfile, I still end up with all the
texts responding to him.
I do wish everyone would just let his posts alone and not respond. I
know, I know. Not going to happen.
I can mark the thread when they devolve into petty argument, but I am
reluctant to killfile those who do respond to Alan, as they sometimes
have interesting things to say.
Yep, ditto to all of that.
Baker's been in my killfile for years. He sometimes changes his 'from' address to escape but I just put him back in the first post I see. For
years I read his posts and even tried to rationalise with him a few
times but to no avail.
I'd hate to be that needy and lonely myself but that doesn't mean I'm--- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
going to be one of his charity workers. I have a friend who has a very autistic, non-verbal son and interacting with that boy is a piece of
cake compared with how Baker interacts with others
I have only changed my email address because I was having trouble with
my Usenet server and was trying to get it working again properly.
I have only changed my email address because I was having trouble with
my Usenet server and was trying to get it working again properly.
I was having trouble
I have only changed my email address because I was having trouble with
my Usenet server and was trying to get it working again properly.
I have only changed my email address because I was having trouble with
my Usenet server and was trying to get it working again properly.
People have this weird idea
On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 3:53:53 PM UTC-6, Alan wrote:
What is my "problem" as you see it?
You are a trolling piece of shit.
And a disgrace of a F1 fan.
On 2022-04-12 1:55 p.m., Vasco Costa wrote:
On 12/04/2022, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where
Hamilton is so much as mentioned:
Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever
said.
Over the last decades I visited this group on and off. After a long
period I'm back and enjoying it quite a lot, perhaps even more than
before. Except your posts. If you were just anti-Hamilton, it
wouldn't be a problem, but from what I'm seeing in just a week
since my return you basically love to antagonise every single post. Including even my post about the Red Bull being an understeering
hog that is eating the front tyres. All you needed to do was listen
to one of the many radio messages from Max complaining about it. Or
read one of the three links I showed you, but that you selectively
ignored, because you had already fulfilled your antagonising
desires.
I see two possible reasons for that:
1. You're a troll wannabe, even if very poor at that.
2. You're not a troll but only enjoy antagonising others.
None of which interest me anymore, even if I'm all for freedom of
speech and against central moderation. Basically you're annoying to
read and my next course of action is probably going to be using a
killfile to filter out all posts from you. This is the beauty of
Usenet.
I had waited before making a post like this, because I was giving
you the benefit of doubt, since I've returned to RASF1 only last
week. However, seeing so many posts from the regulars here
basically confirming my thoughts made it clear to me.
If you're open to accept some constructive criticism and if your
problem is just about antagonism (I've been there, done that),
allow yourself to find some posts you agree with and give positive feedback, even if you add something else to the discussion. It's a
good exercise.
What is my "problem" as you see it? Is it that I tell the truth too
much?
:-)
Alan wrote:
On 2022-04-12 1:55 p.m., Vasco Costa wrote:<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>
On 12/04/2022, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where
Hamilton is so much as mentioned:
Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever
said.
Over the last decades I visited this group on and off. After a long
period I'm back and enjoying it quite a lot, perhaps even more than
before. Except your posts. If you were just anti-Hamilton, it
wouldn't be a problem, but from what I'm seeing in just a week
since my return you basically love to antagonise every single post.
Including even my post about the Red Bull being an understeering
hog that is eating the front tyres. All you needed to do was listen
to one of the many radio messages from Max complaining about it. Or
read one of the three links I showed you, but that you selectively
ignored, because you had already fulfilled your antagonising
desires.
I see two possible reasons for that:
1. You're a troll wannabe, even if very poor at that.
2. You're not a troll but only enjoy antagonising others.
None of which interest me anymore, even if I'm all for freedom of
speech and against central moderation. Basically you're annoying to
read and my next course of action is probably going to be using a
killfile to filter out all posts from you. This is the beauty of
Usenet.
I had waited before making a post like this, because I was giving
you the benefit of doubt, since I've returned to RASF1 only last
week. However, seeing so many posts from the regulars here
basically confirming my thoughts made it clear to me.
If you're open to accept some constructive criticism and if your
problem is just about antagonism (I've been there, done that),
allow yourself to find some posts you agree with and give positive
feedback, even if you add something else to the discussion. It's a
good exercise.
What is my "problem" as you see it? Is it that I tell the truth too
much?
:-)
So much so that you end up getting caught in a tangle of lies in nearly
every thread you hopelessly extend.
I'm not even sure if you are simply delusional; a pathological liar.
Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where Hamilton is so much as mentioned:
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>
Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.
| Sysop: | Nitro |
|---|---|
| Location: | Portland, OR |
| Users: | 3 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 02:04:58 |
| Calls: | 136 |
| Files: | 751 |
| Messages: | 89,379 |