As frustratingly processional as it (usually) is, surely it would be the last nail in the coffin that Liberty could ram into F1 should this
historic GP be omitted ?
geoff
geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
As frustratingly processional as it (usually) is, surely it would be the
last nail in the coffin that Liberty could ram into F1 should this
historic GP be omitted ?
geoff
Spa would be a much greater loss IMO.
As frustratingly processional as it (usually) is, surely it would be
the last nail in the coffin that Liberty could ram into F1 should
this historic GP be omitted ?
geoff wrote:
As frustratingly processional as it (usually) is, surely it would be
the last nail in the coffin that Liberty could ram into F1 should
this historic GP be omitted ?
Why do you think that?
On 31/05/2022 1:35 am, Bigbird wrote:
geoff wrote:
As frustratingly processional as it (usually) is, surely it would
be the last nail in the coffin that Liberty could ram into F1
should this historic GP be omitted ?
Why do you think that?
The historical context, the 'glamour',the unique setting, and the
profound association with F1 in the mind of the public in general.
geoff wrote:
On 31/05/2022 1:35 am, Bigbird wrote:
geoff wrote:
As frustratingly processional as it (usually) is, surely it would
be the last nail in the coffin that Liberty could ram into F1
should this historic GP be omitted ?
Why do you think that?
The historical context, the 'glamour',the unique setting, and the
profound association with F1 in the mind of the public in general.
I think the greater perception is that it is a boring race that mainly
exists for historical reasons but has little place in the modern F1
calendar except for the glamour.
I certainly don't see losing it as a problem for the sport or the fans.
F1 can exist quite happily with a little less money on the table.
"Bigbird" <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> writes:
geoff wrote:would >> > > be the last nail in the coffin that Liberty could ram
On 31/05/2022 1:35 am, Bigbird wrote:
geoff wrote:
As frustratingly processional as it (usually) is, surely it
into F1 >> > > should this historic GP be omitted ?
Why do you think that?
The historical context, the 'glamour',the unique setting, and the
profound association with F1 in the mind of the public in general.
I think the greater perception is that it is a boring race that
mainly exists for historical reasons but has little place in the
modern F1 calendar except for the glamour.
What if, in the eyes of most of those providing the largest income
into the sport, the race isn't perceived as "boring", that simply
isn't a property being evaluated? When blingy rappers or actors and
suchlike are being namedropped by the commentators, I get the feeling
that for many people, it's really not so much about the racing at all.
For most there, it's more important to be seen than to see any racing.
I certainly don't see losing it as a problem for the sport or the
fans. F1 can exist quite happily with a little less money on the
table.
As a fan of racing, I agree with you, although I did enjoy the quali
and the first 30 laps of the race this year. I'm happy to accept I
might be in bit of a minority.
With the prospect of the racing improving over the next couple of years
the Monaco procession can only look more out of place on the calendar.
I can take it or leave it.
On 1/06/2022 3:02 am, Bigbird wrote:
With the prospect of the racing improving over the next couple of
years the Monaco procession can only look more out of place on the calendar. I can take it or leave it.
But Spa ?!!!
Phil Carmody wrote:...
If the net result is a bit less money in the circus F1 can survive...
that. Money has done more harm than good to the sport.
With the prospect of the racing improving over the next couple of years
the Monaco procession can only look more out of place on the calendar.
I can take it or leave it.
Sysop: | Nitro |
---|---|
Location: | Portland, OR |
Users: | 3 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 02:35:48 |
Calls: | 136 |
Files: | 751 |
Messages: | 89,384 |